annuin: (Apparrliss)
[personal profile] annuin
And no, that's not a pun on Dubya.

Apparantly Diebold's voting machines can be hacked, by a monkey, or any other person with virtually no computer skills. Which of course makes it a lot easier for those people who do have skills to fiddle around with stuff.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133214,00.html

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-27 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vgnwtch.livejournal.com
Yep - they've been talking about this for at least a year, probably more. There are so many leaked internal company memos about the security holes it's just not funny, plus all the industry and independent studies have shown how vulnerable the system is. Going to be an interesting November.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-27 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trejkaz.livejournal.com
The Australian system is probably going the same way.

It started off as open source, and soaked up all the media attention. After obtaining comments and bugfixes from the community, then they closed the source off and told the community to fuck off. In a year we'll be having the same kind of story show up, when someone finds a vulnerability that would have been fixed if only they hadn't closed it.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-27 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tanthe.livejournal.com
Were their widdle feelings all hurt by people sending in bugfixes and critiques?

I don't get that attitude. You would think for a system as important as vote counting they'd want to make it as secure as possible and get as much input on it as they can from people all over. Sometimes it's others who see things with fresh eyes that those who've worked on it for ages don't.

Plus open source just has the benefit of it being "transparent", anyone with a mind to do so can see how the program works, and it instills more trust. At least it would for me. You can't hide much if the source is publically viewable.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-27 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trejkaz.livejournal.com
Yeah. I imagine that someone would spot the LiberalVotes++ in only a few minutes of quick browsing of the source code. Now, no such thing. If they start implementing the system outside of Canberra you can be sure there will be complaints...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-04 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daskreestof.livejournal.com
How can anyone believe that something microsoft would be secure, and not republican leaning?

Don't be suprised if neither bush nor kerry win, but some how Bill Gates takes in a landslide victory.

Profile

annuin: (Default)
Marieke

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags